A prominent campaign-finance watchdog group has formally filed two criminal referrals against Zohran Mamdani, a leading candidate in the race for New York City mayor, alleging that his campaign illegally accepted contributions from foreign nationals.
The group behind the referrals, the Coolidge Reagan Foundation (CRF), submitted the detailed complaints on Tuesday to both the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the office of Manhattan’s District Attorney, Alvin Bragg. According to the CRF’s filings, Mamdani may have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), as well as applicable provisions of New York state election law.
Allegations Detail a “Sustained Pattern” of Foreign Funds
The CRF alleges that, between December 2024 and September 2025, the Mamdani campaign accepted at least 161 contributions from sources outside the United States—specifically from individuals who listed foreign addresses. The total amount amassed from these foreign-addressed donors is said to exceed $12,000.
The foreign contributors reportedly listed addresses in several countries, including Dubai, Australia, Turkey, France, Canada, and Germany, among others. One specific contribution under intense scrutiny was a reported $500 donation from the candidate’s mother-in-law, who is alleged to have a Dubai address. Public records indicate this particular donation was refunded four days after the campaign was reportedly alerted to the issue.
The CRF contends that many of these donations came from individuals who provided no verifiable information about employment or residency, which significantly complicates the process of confirming whether the donors are actually U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents living abroad (who are allowed to contribute), or prohibited foreign nationals.
In the words of the CRF, as stated in their referrals, these are “not isolated incidents or clerical errors.” Instead, the group characterizes the inflow of foreign funds as a “sustained pattern of foreign money flowing into a New York City mayoral race.” According to CRF president Dan Backer, that pattern violates both federal and local campaign-finance laws.
Legal Framework and Penalties
Under FECA—specifically codified at 52 U.S.C. § 30121—it is unlawful for any “foreign national” to make a contribution, donation, expenditure, or disbursement in connection with any federal, state, or local election in the United States. Furthermore, it is equally illegal for any person to knowingly solicit, accept, or receive such a contribution from a foreign national. The prohibition extends to indirect contributions, covering not only the direct donation of money but also “anything of value” directed toward influencing an election.
Violators can be subject to both civil penalties (fines) and severe criminal penalties, including potential imprisonment, if authorities successfully prove that a candidate “knowingly and willfully” accepted prohibited contributions.
The CRF’s referral to the DOJ calls for a criminal investigation for potential FECA violations. The parallel referral to the Manhattan DA’s office also cites possible violations of state or local law, specifically pointing to a provision under New York election law that prohibits conspiracy to influence an election by unlawful means. The CRF argues that the mere act of soliciting or accepting contributions from foreign nationals constitutes a breach, regardless of whether the funds were ultimately kept, meaning returning questionable donations does not automatically “erase” the violation.
Mamdani Campaign’s Response and Current Status
The Mamdani campaign has publicly acknowledged that some of the contributions originated from individuals listing foreign addresses. However, the campaign asserts that some of those donors are indeed U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents living abroad—individuals who are legally permitted to contribute under federal law.
A campaign spokesperson stated that the campaign maintains a compliance process intended to verify the eligibility of donors who provide foreign addresses, and has pledged that any impermissible contributions will be promptly refunded. According to publicly available records cited by media outlets, the campaign has refunded some of the challenged foreign-address donations, but not all. Reports indicate that at least 88 donations, amounting to roughly $7,190, remain unrefunded as of the latest filings.
As of now, neither the DOJ nor the Manhattan District Attorney’s office has publicly announced whether they have opened a formal criminal investigation or intend to file charges.
Broader Implications for Election Integrity
This case highlights the critical risks posed by foreign-source money in U.S. elections. Federal law strictly prohibits foreign nationals from financially influencing U.S. political campaigns precisely to prevent external interference and protect the fundamental integrity of American democratic processes.
If prosecutors ultimately determine that the donations came from actual foreign nationals (not just Americans living abroad), and that the Mamdani campaign “knowingly accepted” them, the legal consequences could be serious, potentially triggering the criminal penalties allowed under FECA, including fines and possible prison sentences.
The case also serves as a stark warning that campaign-donation compliance must be rigorous and continuous, especially when dealing with donors who list foreign addresses or bank accounts. Campaigns must actively verify citizenship or legal resident status; failure to do so may open them up to significant legal jeopardy, even if they later refund the money. Politically, these allegations and the criminal referrals could damage public trust, influence voter perception, and become a crucial factor in how voters evaluate Mamdani’s suitability for the office of mayor.
The story originally appeared on [Link].
