One thing is for sure: apologizing could set a dangerous precedent. If ABC apologizes for fact-checking Trump, what’s next? Will networks have to apologize every time they point out that a candidate’s claim isn’t quite grounded in reality? Will fact-checking itself become an endangered practice in an era where “alternative facts” are embraced as valid?
It seems ABC is stuck between a rock and a hard place—apologize and lose credibility with those who believe in journalistic integrity, or stand firm and risk further blackouts from NBC Comcast.
As NBC Comcast and ABC continue their feud, the future of televised debates hangs in the balance. Are we headed for a world where fact-checking is considered overreach? Where candidates can say whatever they want, no matter how absurd, without fear of correction?
One thing’s clear: this is more than just a spat between two media giants. It’s a reflection of the larger battle over truth, accountability, and what role the media should play in political discourse. Should networks act as referees, calling out falsehoods when they see them? Or should they simply let the candidates duke it out without intervention, letting the viewers decide what’s real and what’s not?
CONTINUE READING ON THE NEXT PAGE Advertisement:
Easy Banana Bread
Discover the Astonishing Beauty Benefits of Vaseline and Lemon
FRIED POTATOES AND ONIONS
IMMACULATE WHITE CLOTHES WITHOUT IRONING, THE SECRET IS TO PUT 1 TABLESPOOON IN THE WASHING MACHINE
Two Spoons in the Morning: A Natural Remedy for Bone Pain, Diabetes, Nerves, and Depression
Women with this kind of finger don’t have to work hard to become rich throughout their life
Strawberry Cheesecake Cinnabon Rolls with Pecans
Why You Should Put Star Anise on Your Feet: A Natural Remedy You Didn’t Know You Needed
Strongest Belly Fat Burner Drink: Lemon and Ginger | Drink Twice a Day to Lose 10kg in 2 Weeks
