One thing is for sure: apologizing could set a dangerous precedent. If ABC apologizes for fact-checking Trump, what’s next? Will networks have to apologize every time they point out that a candidate’s claim isn’t quite grounded in reality? Will fact-checking itself become an endangered practice in an era where “alternative facts” are embraced as valid?
It seems ABC is stuck between a rock and a hard place—apologize and lose credibility with those who believe in journalistic integrity, or stand firm and risk further blackouts from NBC Comcast.
As NBC Comcast and ABC continue their feud, the future of televised debates hangs in the balance. Are we headed for a world where fact-checking is considered overreach? Where candidates can say whatever they want, no matter how absurd, without fear of correction?
One thing’s clear: this is more than just a spat between two media giants. It’s a reflection of the larger battle over truth, accountability, and what role the media should play in political discourse. Should networks act as referees, calling out falsehoods when they see them? Or should they simply let the candidates duke it out without intervention, letting the viewers decide what’s real and what’s not?
CONTINUE READING ON THE NEXT PAGE Advertisement:
HOW TO MAKE INSTANT POT LO MEIN WITH BEEF AND BROCCOLI
This is my hubby’s kryptonite; he just can’t resist asking for more
How To Make Baked Cream Cheese Spaghetti
11 best smelling houseplants to make your home smell amazing
Irresistible Cream and Berry-Filled Pastry Balls: A Sweet Delight for All Occasions
This is absolutely decadent! My hubby can eat at least 4 bowls
Shaq Throws Tim Walz Out of His Restaurant: “Don’t Come Back Here, You’re a Disappointment”
The Steelers have ann0unced they will b0yc0tt Pride Nights, j0ining the Chiefs – Satire.
Chicken puffs with roasted garlic
