ABC’s executives, faced with the harsh reality of a $27 million shortfall, still tried to salvage the situation. “Look, we’re not going to apologize for fact-checking,” said an unnamed ABC official. “If we wanted to host a fantasy debate where people can just say anything and no one challenges it, we’d run a reality TV show. Oh wait, we already do.”
Despite this brave face, the financial blow was undeniable. Losing $27 million in a single swoop of advertiser rage doesn’t just sting—it leaves a mark. And the executives at ABC, realizing they can’t exactly bill the DNC or RNC for the damage, have made a bold decision: no more debates.
“We’re done with debates. Completely,” the official continued. “No more moderators getting yelled at, no more advertisers jumping ship, and no more real-time corrections that turn our stage into a game show where facts actually matter.”
So, what does this mean for future political debates? If ABC’s decision is any indication, the days of fact-checking, journalistic integrity, and high production value may be behind us.
Insiders suggest that the 2028 election debates will be unmoderated, unstructured, and held on the front lawns of the candidates themselves. “It’ll be like the Wild West out there,” one political analyst joked. “Just candidates shouting at each other while the audience throws tomatoes—or tweets.”
In fact, ABC’s rivals are reportedly eyeing the situation closely, wondering whether they should get in on this new wave of debate-free debates. “Why bother moderating at all?” asked one industry insider. “Just let the candidates talk for two hours, sell ad spots in between the shouting, and call it a night. No one fact-checks anyway—it’s all about entertainment now.”
