Former President Donald Trump has unveiled a fresh economic proposal on Truth Social, outlining an ambitious plan to finance a nationwide dividend through tariff revenue. In his post, Trump claimed the initiative would deliver “a dividend of at least $2,000 per person (excluding high-income earners),” presenting it as a direct return of national wealth to the American people.

The central concept, as Trump described it, hinges on imposing tariffs on imported goods and channeling a portion of that revenue back to U.S. citizens. He argued that such a strategy would require foreign exporters to shoulder more of the economic burden while funneling those proceeds into American households.

Trump vigorously defended tariffs as a potent economic instrument, dismissing critics as “fools” for opposing them. He pointed to what he characterized as strong markets and low inflation under his administration as proof that his trade policies were both effective and advantageous for the country.

Yet despite the sweeping nature of the proposal, details surrounding the so-called “American Dividend” remain vague. Trump offered no explanation for how the payments would be distributed, who would meet eligibility requirements, or what mechanisms would ensure oversight. Potential options could include direct payments, tax credits, or financial offsets for essential expenses—though none have been formally addressed.

Economists note that dividend programs funded by tariffs are rare in modern U.S. policy, though parallels exist abroad. The Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes annual payments to residents using oil revenue, is often cited as an example of how shared national income can function in practice.

Experts warn that broad tariff systems can lead to higher consumer prices and complicate international trade relationships. Still, proponents argue they could strengthen domestic industries, encourage U.S.-based production, and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains.

For now, Trump’s proposal functions more as political messaging than a fully developed policy plan. Transforming it into a workable program would require extensive design, congressional approval, and a thorough evaluation of its economic implications.

Ultimately, the proposal underscores a recurring theme in Trump’s economic vision: leveraging national revenue streams to place American households at the center of policy. Whether a tariff-funded dividend can become reality will depend on future debate, structural design, and the political will to see it through.

The story originally appeared on [Link].